Culture:

Martye Allen, animal spirit- and dog-catcher

by Kathleen Sloan | April 8, 2021
5 min read
"Totem," earthenware clay, 8 1/4" x 7 3/4" X 6"

Martye Allen’s influences are Mimbres pottery, Inuit stone sculpture and cave paintings in France and Spain, and as is true of those tribal cultures, she, too, has a deep connection with animals, the subject of her art.

Allen’s paintings, prints and sculptures of animals are on show at Rio Bravo Fine Art in Truth or Consequences through April 25, although she is among the gallery’s stable of artists and her work can always be seen there.

Her clay sculptures of ravens and bears are “sawdust fired earthenware” that have a mysterious smoky surface. Smoke, in Native American tobacco rituals, carries prayers and thoughts to the spirit world. Infused into the clay’s surface, the smoke swirls over the raven’s beak or up the bear’s back, enlivening their forms, turning them into spirit-world figures, giving them portent.

Animal Canoe
Animal Canoe,” earthware clay, 3″ x 17″ x 3″. The mysterious smoky surfaces of Allen’s ceramics comes from firing her pieces in a covering of sawdust and pine needles.

Allen learned the sawdust firing technique from Alice Cling, a famous Navajo potter, which she now duplicates and experiments with in her self-built brick kiln.

Allen first pre-fires the sculptures at a high temperature and then places them in a lower-temperature brick kiln. The figures are “completely buried” in sawdust and pine needles. For four or five hours, a slow-burning fire in the upper story of the kiln transmutes the surface of the clay.

The sculptures are particularly receptive to the smoke and pine pitch effects due to the numerous coatings of “terra sigillata.” “Terra sig is basically clay and water,” Allen said. She purchases it now, but used to make it herself. The finest clay particles float to the top of the mixture and are carefully decanted, the “slip” painted over the whole surface in thin coats.

Martye Allen and her dog Django
The artist and her dog Django live part time in Truth or Consequences and part time in Wisconsin.

Allen loves the chance effects of the firing process, the pine pitch sometimes producing a molasses-like glaze or the surface retaining the ghostly impression of the tiny square sawdust bits that “mask the smoke, like a resist method.”

Allen also used to find and make her own clay, but now buys it from the same New Mexico source from which she purchases the terra sigilatta. “It is so responsive. By that I mean the barest touch, each indentation is captured. You don’t have to work it and work it.”

Asked if she looks up the spiritual meaning of the animals, Allen said, “of course.”

The book, “Medicine Cards: The Discovery of Power Through the Ways of Animals,” draws upon ancient wisdom and tradition to teach the healing medicine of animals, according to authors Jamie Sams and David Carson. Of Allen’s preferred subjects, the book says:

Throughout time, Raven has carried the medicine of magic. . . . Raven magic is a powerful medicine that can give you the courage to enter the darkness of the void . . . the Great Mystery. . . . Raven is the messenger of the void. . . . Raven’s color is the color of the void—the black hole in space that holds all the energy of the creative source.

Bear is the West, the intuitive side, the right brain. . . . Bear seeks answers while he/she is dreaming or hibernating. . . . In choosing Bear, the power of knowing has invited you to enter the silence and become acquainted with the Dream Lodge, so that your goals may become concrete realities. This is the strength of Bear.”

Allen’s paintings of dogs are not the same between-worlds spirits found in her sculptures. They are panting playmates looking for you to throw the ball or give them a treat.

"Flo," Allen's portrait of a golden retriever
“Flo” and “Stanley” (right). Allen’s objective in painting portraits of beloved dogs is to make them come alive.

For the last few years she has been doing the six-inch square paintings she calls “mug shots” of beloved dogs, based on her photographs of them.

Stanley

Returning to painting decades after pursuing it in college “is so stressful,” Allen said, but “I know what I’m going for and I work at it until it happens. I want it to look like the photo, but I want it to be alive.”

She builds up the canvas using different media, first drawing on the canvas, then sometimes “doing a quick watercolor,” followed by water-based oil paint, using her fingers as often as a paintbrush to achieve just the right smear to capture a lit eye and salivating dog smirk.

She purposely keeps the background quiet, so the dog’s persona remains the focus, fine-tuning the color until it becomes a springboard for the figure.

“I don’t know what I’m doing,” Allen claims, while achieving the highest goal in animal or people portraiture—capturing living character on canvas.

Editor’s Note: Rio Bravo’s artist profile of Martye Allen can be read here.

author
Share this:
HAVE YOU SEEN?

Understanding New Mexico's proposed new social studies standards for K-12 students

“The primary purpose of social studies is to help young people develop the ability to make informed and reasoned decisions for the public good as citizens of a culturally diverse, democratic society in an interdependent world.”
—National Council for the Social Studies 

Reader Michael L. Hayes of Las Cruces commented: What impresses me is that both the proposed standards and some of the criticisms of them are equally grotesque. I make this bold statement on the basis of my experience as a peripatetic high school and college English teacher for 45 years in many states with many students differing in race, religion, gender and socioeconomic background, and as a civic activist (PTA) in public education (My career, however, was as an independent consultant mainly in defense, energy and the environment.)

The proposed social studies standards are conceptually and instructionally flawed. For starters, a “performance standard” is not a standard at all; it is a task. Asking someone to explain something is not unlike asking someone to water the lawn. Nothing measures the performance, but without a measure, there is no standard. The teacher’s subjective judgment will be all that matters, and almost anything will count as satisfying a “performance standard,” even just trying. Students will be left to wonder “what is on the teacher’s mind?” or “have I sucked up enough.”

Four other quick criticisms of the performance standards. One, they are nearly unintelligible because they are written in jargon. PED’s use of jargon in a document intended for the public is worrisome. Bureaucrats often use jargon to confuse or conceal something uninformed, wrong or unworthy. As a result, most parents, some school board members and more than a few teachers do not understand them.

Two, the performance standards are so vague that they fail to define the education which teachers are supposed to teach, students are supposed to learn, and parents are supposed to understand. PED does not define words like “explain” or “describe” so that teachers can apply “standards” consistently and fairly. The standards do not indicate what teachers are supposed to know in order to teach or specify what students are supposed to learn. Supervisors cannot know whether teachers are teaching social studies well or poorly. The standards are so vague that the public, especially parents or guardians, cannot know the content of public education.

Three, many performance standards are simply unrealistic, especially at grade level. Under “Ethnic, Cultural and Identity Performance Standards”; then under “Diversity and Identity”; then under “Kindergarten,” one such standard is: “Identify how their family does things both the same as and different from how other people do things.” Do six-year-olds know how other people do things? Do they know whether these things are relevant to diversity and identity? Or another standard: “Describe their family history, culture, and past to current contributions of people in their main identity groups.” (A proficient writer would have hyphenated the compound adjective to avoid confusing the reader.) Do six-year-olds know so much about these things in relation to their “identity group”? Since teachers obviously do not teach them about these other people and have not taught them about these groups, why are these and similar items in the curriculum; or do teachers assign them to go home and collect this information?

Point four follows from “three”; some information relevant to some performance measures requires a disclosure of personal or family matters. The younger the students, the easier it is for teachers to invade their privacy and not only their privacy, but also the privacy of their parents or guardians, or neighbors, who may never be aware of these disclosures or not become aware of them until afterward. PED has no right to design a curriculum which requires teachers to ask students for information about themselves, parents or guardians, or neighbors, or puts teachers on the spot if the disclosures reveal criminal conduct. (Bill says Jeff’s father plays games in bed with his daughter. Lila says Angelo’s mother gives herself shots in the arm.) Since teacher-student communications have no legal protection to ensure privacy, those disclosures may become public accidentally or deliberately. The effect of these proposal standards is to turn New Mexico schools and teachers into investigative agents of the state and students into little informants or spies.

This PED proposal for social studies standards is a travesty of education despite its appeals to purportedly enlightened principles. It constitutes a clear and present danger to individual liberty and civil liberties. It should be repudiated; its development, investigated; its PED perpetrators, dismissed. No state curriculum should encourage or require the disclosure of private personal information.

I am equally outraged by the comments of some of T or C’s school board members: Christine LaFont and Julianne Stroup, two white Christian women, who belong to one of the larger minorities in America and assume white and Christian privileges. In different terms but for essentially the same reason, both oppose an education which includes lessons about historical events and trends, and social movements and developments, of other minorities. They object to the proposal for the new social studies standards because of its emphasis on individual and group identities not white or Christian. I am not going to reply with specific objections; they are too numerous and too pointed.

Ms. LaFont urges: “It’s better to address what’s similar with all Americans. It’s not good to differentiate.” Ms. Stroup adds: “Our country is not a racist country. We have to teach to respect each other. We have civil rights laws that protect everyone from discrimination. We need to teach civics, love and respect. We need to teach how to be color blind.”

Their desires for unity and homogeneity, and for mutual respect, are a contradiction and an impossibility. Aside from a shared citizenship, which implies acceptance of the Constitution, the rule of law and equality under the law, little else defines Americans. We are additionally defined by our race, religion, national origin, etc. So mutual respect requires individuals to respect others different from themselves. Disrespect desires blacks, Jews or Palestinians to assimilate or to suppress or conceal racial, religious or national origin aspects of their identity. The only people who want erasure of nonwhite, non-Christian, non-American origin aspects of identity are bigots. Ms. LaFont and Ms. Stroud want standards which, by stressing similarities and eliding differences, desire the erasure of such aspects. What they want will result in a social studies curriculum that enables white, Christian, native-born children to grow up to be bigots and all others to be their victims. This would be the academic equivalent of ethnic cleansing.

H.E.L.P.

This postmortem of a case involving a 75-year-old women who went missing from her home in Hillsboro last September sheds light on the bounds of law enforcement’s capacity to respond, especially in large rural jurisdictions such as Sierra County, and underscores the critical role the public, as well as concerned family and friends, can play in assisting a missing person’s search.

Reader Jane Debrott of Hillsboro commented: Thank you for your article on the tragic loss of Betsey. I am a resident of Hillsboro, a friend of Rick and Betsey, and a member of H.E.L.P. The thing that most distresses me now, is the emphasis on Rick’s mis-naming of the color of their car. I fear that this fact will cause Rick to feel that if he had only gotten the facts right, Betsey may have been rescued before it was too late. The incident was a series of unavoidable events, out of everyone’s control, and we will never know what place the correct color of her car may have had in the outcome. It breaks my heart to think that Rick has had one more thing added to his “what ifs” concerning this incident.

Diana Tittle responded: Dear Jane, the Sun undertook this investigation at the request of a Hillsboro resident concerned about the town’s inability to mount a prompt, coordinated response to the disappearance of a neighbor. From the beginning, I shared your concern about how our findings might affect Betsy’s family and friends. After I completed my research and began writing, I weighed each detail I eventually chose to include against my desire to cause no pain and the public’s right to know about the strengths and limitations of law enforcement’s response and the public’s need to know about how to be of meaningful assistance.

There was information I withheld about the state police investigation and the recovery. But I decided to include the issue of the car’s color because the individuals who spotted Betsy’s car emphasized how its color had been key to their identification of it as the vehicle described in Betsy’s Silver Alert. Because the misinformation was corrected within a couple of hours, I also included in this story the following editorial comment meant to put the error in perspective: “The fact that law enforcement throughout the state was on the lookout in the crucial early hours after Betsy’s disappearance for an elderly woman driving a “light blue” instead of a “silver” Accord would, in retrospect, likely not have changed the outcome of the search” [emphasis added].

I would also point to the story’s overarching conclusion about the inadvisability of assigning blame for what happened: “In this case, a perfect storm of unfortunate circumstances, many of them beyond human control, hindered the search that it would fall to Hamilton’s department to lead.”

It is my hope that any pain caused by my reporting will eventually be outweighed by its contribution to a better community understanding of what it will take in the future to mount a successful missing person’s search in rural Sierra County.

Scroll to Top