Elephant Butte City Council news roundup

by Kathleen Sloan | May 21, 2021
6 min read
Source: City of Elephant Butte

During the May 19 Elephant Butte City Council meeting, councilors heard a presentation from the city’s outside auditor on the 2019-2020 year-end audit.

A resolution affirming that the mayor’s and two councilors’ seats are up for election in the fall was approved. However, the resolution will have to be amended—Councilor Gerald LaFont resigned at the end of the meeting.

LaFont’s resignation, which is effective July 1, leaves only Councilor Travis Atwell’s seat uncontested in November.

In an open session following a two-hour closed session, the council approved a preliminary budget for the 2021-2022 fiscal year.

AUDIT

Ashley Tierney of Beasley, Mitchell & Company of Las Cruces, was the city’s outside auditor for the fiscal 2019-2020 year-end audit. Tierney reported that the city only had three “findings,” or violations of accounting practices. This performance compared favorably to 11 findings the year before and 18 findings in fiscal year 2017-2018.

The three findings were “repeat findings” from the 2018-2019 audit. Tierney said “it is quite common” for a finding to take two or three years to “clear up.”

The first finding concerned lack of authorization for expenditures. In six out of 25 samples, purchase orders were missing required authorization signatures.

The second finding involved cash management. Beasley said a “three-way check” was made, comparing cash in the general ledger, reconciled bank statements and the year-end financial report submitted to the New Mexico Department of Finance and Administration. The three cash balances did not match, which Beasley attributed to “older general ledger entries” that “have been forgotten” and need to be investigated and “cleaned up.”

The third finding concerned “expenses in excess of budget.” The city “operates on a cash basis, but reporting is done on an accrual basis,” Beasley said. Sheexplained that an expense incurred in a prior fiscal year, but paid for in the subsequent fiscal year, should be reported in the prior fiscal year, using accrual-basis accounting. Otherwise, “this throws the [cash-basis accounting] budget off.”

“I am very pleased with the improvements made,” Beasley said, and praised the Elephant Butte staff’s hard work.

PRELIMINARY BUDGET

After a closed executive session, the city council approved the 2021-2022 preliminary budget, which is due at the Department of Finance and Administration on June 1.

The preliminary budget listed revenues and expenses by department and did not state a total budget figure.

General Fund

The city estimates that its major operating fund—the General Fund—will take in about $1,033,500 in revenue in 2021-2022. The current fiscal-year budget, which ends June 30, estimated the General Fund would take in about $780,400 in revenue. As of March 31, the General Fund had taken in $869,845, exceeding expectations.

The higher-than-expected revenue can be attributed in part to elevated local and state Gross Receipts Taxes.

The city is conservatively estimating GRT revenue for the upcoming fiscal year—expecting to bring in about $40,000 more than last year’s receipt of nearly $301,200.

The city projects receipt of $150,000 from the federal “Coronavirus Relief Fund” in the upcoming fiscal year. Those monies will be placed in the General Fund.  

General Fund expenses for the upcoming fiscal year are estimated at nearly $1.58 million, about $550,000 more than the estimated revenues. This year’s budget set General Fund expenditures at $1.3 million. The ending balance for this fiscal year is expected to be about $268,400. The ending balance of General Fund next year is expected to be about $45,500, since higher spending will deplete the cash reserve.

The General Fund will again support operations, maintenance and repairs at the Sierra del Rio Golf Course, as it has since the city was given the property in 2018. This fiscal year the city paid Spirit Golf $240,000 to manage the property; in the upcoming year the management fee will be reduced to $216,000. Spirit Golf’s five-year contract with the city stipulates that the company’s fee will decrease each year.

Elephant Butte has also budgeted $125,000 for repair and maintenance of the golf course and buildings, bringing the city’s total General Fund support of the facility to $341,000.

A total of $495,328 is budgeted to be transferred out of the General Fund in the upcoming year. Transfers include $30,000 to the Law Enforcement Fund. The city contracts for policing services with the Sierra County Sheriff’s Department.

About $124,328 will be transferred out of the General Fund into the debt fund to pay off past loans, according to Elephant Butte City Clerk and Treasurer Rani Bush.

Capital projects

The upcoming year’s budget projects over $3 million in capital projects, compared to nearly $643,000 this fiscal year.

The revenue sources for the projects are expected to be nearly $2.2 million in state grants, $550,000 in state “legislative appropriation” funding and about $247,000 in local funding.

The expansion of the wastewater system will continue, with $400,000 expected to be spent this fiscal year and $550,000 in the upcoming fiscal year.

A $1.2 million project to improve the water system will be undertaken in the upcoming fiscal year. There were no such capital expenditures budgeted in the current fiscal year.

The city budgeted $15,000 for an off-road vehicle park this fiscal year and the same amount for the upcoming fiscal year.

Warm Springs Boulevard will be upgraded at an estimated cost of $460,000, to be spent in the upcoming fiscal year.

Expenditures on the Michigan Drive road project are estimated at nearly $230,000 this fiscal year and about $753,000 in the upcoming fiscal year.

An estimated $25,000-plus will be spent on Mescal Loop, another road project, in the upcoming fiscal year.

NOVEMBER ELECTION RESOLUTION

Elephant Butte no longer runs its own elections. The city council opted to have Sierra County’s Clerk run its elections when state election laws changed in 2019, giving local governments such a choice. The local government is still required to pass a resolution stating what positions are open in the general election, to be sent to the county clerk, who forwards it to the New Mexico Secretary of State.

At the May 19 meeting council approved an election resolution that lists three open positions:

• the mayor’s seat (four-year term)

• a city council seat currently occupied by Mike Williams (four-year term)

• a city council seat currently occupied by Mayor Pro Tem Kim Skinner (four-year term)

City Clerk and Treasurer Rani Bush told the Sun city council will amend the election resolution at its June meeting, adding a fourth position:

• a city council seat currently occupied by Gerald LaFont, who has resigned as of July 1. His elected replacement will take office January 1, 2022 and fulfill LaFont’s remaining term, which ends Dec. 31, 2023.

According to Councilor Mike Williams, the city council agreed to appoint someone to govern in LaFont’s place in the intervening six months, from July 1 to Dec. 31. The city council held this discussion in open session following a two-hour closed executive session, Williams said.

Those interested in the appointment should contact her, Bush told the Sun.

LaFont’s Resignation

Gerald LaFont resigned at the end of the first open session at the May 19 city council meeting. He read a letter he had prepared, addressed to the city council and mayor, according to Bush.

The letter stated he had carefully considered the decision before resigning and that it had been a pleasure to serve on the city council. He gave no reason for his resignation, but it is known he recently had back surgery.

LaFont served on the city council for 15 years, according to Bush. He did not respond to the Sun’s request for comment.

author
Kathleen Sloan is the Sun’s founder and chief reporter. She can be reached at kathleen.sloan@gmail.com or 575-297-4146.
Share this:
HAVE YOU SEEN?

Foundation for Open Government determines T or C's fees to deliver requested electronic documents not allowed under state law

Truth or Consequences has recently begun to charge a fee of 25 cents per page to deliver electronic records requested under the Inspection of Public Records Act. FOG responded to a citizen request to determine the fee’s validity.

Reader Ron Fenn of Truth or Consequences commented: Thank you for informing on this important “right of the people” to know how our government is acting and spending our money.  Mr. Swingle needs to look at cutting costs (personnel) not penalizing residents to reduce the decades old budget deficits.

T or C still mum about problems with city’s water wells, despite only two of eight working properly

A legal ad in the Sierra County Sentinel’s May 21 edition was the first public notice and acknowledgment that two more wells in the city’s eight-well field are in trouble. Four others are offline, raising questions about the city’s water delivery capacity and the water department’s transparency about the health of the well field.

Reader William West of Truth or Consequences commented: If Wells 6 and 7 are leaking “liquid” or water with oil and metal filings, it seems possible, if not likely, we are drinking the same. If a property with a well is sold, the condition of the well water is part of the seller’s disclosure to the buyer. If T or C water is suspect, either because recent consumer confidence reports were not made public or there are capacity or quality problems with the water the city provides, should these concerns be a part of all property disclosures for sales in the city going forward?

It seems to me that fixing basic needs such as clean water, reliable electrical supply, effective stormwater handling and a transparent and aware city council should come before any consideration of “putting lipstick on a pig”-type projects such as the “Riverwalk.”

 

Wildlife trail or commercial development for Rotary Park?

Please, let us come together to prevent one more desecration. Please let us create, instead, a preserve for wildlife with access for people to the Rio Grande that will stand into the future to preserve the precious, irreplaceable quality of life that we are able to enjoy here.

Reader Patty Kearney of Truth or Consequences commented: Residing in the neighborhood between downtown and Rotary Park, I would not like to see commercial development at Rotary Park. There would be traffic in our residential streets. And the run-off from pavement and/or construction into the river seems environmentally unsound. I have no idea what sort of commercial development is proposed, but I can’t imagine it getting past an environmental impact study—which there ought to be, of course, for anything that goes in that location. I agree with Dr. Spruce. Wetlands restoration and a hiking trail. Investment in projects that make this town more its true self, not something it isn’t, will help us thrive

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top