She was the only Republican candidate in the primary for state senate seat District 35, winning the nomination automatically. The district includes Sierra, Luna and Hidalgo counties.
Since she won’t answer questions, examining her campaign materials are the only option.
She has allied herself with over 100 state senate and house candidates. They are using the umbrella campaign platform, RespectNewMexico.org. The Respect New Mexico trademark is owned by the Republican Party of New Mexico, according to the website.
Respect New Mexico is emphasizing bipartisanship. “We’re Republicans and former Democrats who believe partisan divides are old and unhelpful. We ask you to judge us not by party, but by our promise to respect New Mexico in everything we do.”
Respecting New Mexico means acknowledging that “the health and welfare of New Mexico lags far behind its neighbors. Generational poverty, record crime, a lack of opportunities for our young, and an education system that offers too little support to our teachers are a handful of the many issues our legislature has long been unable to solve.”
“More than one hundred candidates for the House and Senate have pledged to take bold, commonsense action to help the people of our state finally and fully thrive—without compromising our values, traditions, and proud heritage,” the RespectNewMexico website states.
The nearly four-minute video on the site is vague but foreboding. It claims “something is afoot of late, there is a change in the wind. People with power want more power. People with power want more of New Mexico.”
The unspecified power mongers want more of its “natural resources,” the video showing oil wells. They want more of “our wages,” “control of our schools, control of our families, control of our ways of life. They want us to live and think like they do.”
New Mexico, the video claims, is not California or New York.
Diamond, on her website, is a little more specific about who the enemy is and what they are doing wrong.
“I’m running to be your next State Senator from New Mexico District 35 because I have become increasingly concerned by the radical policies being pushed by progressive outsiders in our district. These radical policies will destroy working families, our community’s way of life, and are not in line with the values of District 35. This race isn’t about left vs right — it’s about right vs wrong. Sadly, the special interest groups who are backing my opponent have battled farmers and ranchers for years, want to tear up the 2nd Amendment, and care more about urban issues than they do the issues affecting our community.”
The day after the June 2 Primary, in which Neomi Martinez-Parra won the Democrat-Party nomination over John Arthur Smith, Diamond told the Las Cruces Sun News:
“We are seeing an unprecedented attempt by progressive interest groups to radically move the political landscape away from our traditional New Mexican values,” said Diamond. “I am running to protect our shared value of fiscal responsibility, for hard-working families and small businesses, and to safeguard the freedoms we all enjoy.”
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS
The Sun analyzed Diamond’s website and Facebook page, basing questions on the information she provided. Although she didn’t answer the questions, the underlying analysis may be helpful to voters.
1. Do you feel District 35 has had an influx of liberal-Democrat influences? Who are these influencers? And what policies or ideas are they promoting that you find wrongheaded?
2. Would you be specific about the “traditional values” you are talking about as the basis of your campaign?
3. Most of your constituents live in the cities within your district with a minority living in rural areas, yet you emphasize in your campaign materials that rural issues must be addressed. Why the rural emphasis and what rural issues are you talking about?
4. You state on your Facebook page that legislators are passing laws to prevent removal of undergrowth in national forests, attaching House Memorial 59 to your posting.
First, isn’t a memorial more like sending up a trial balloon than legislation?
Second, the memorial requests support for finding an alternate means besides fire to remove undergrowth.
Therefore the memorial is much more centrist than you have made out in your post. The proponents are not seeking to preserve undergrowth, but to find a happy medium of preserving wildlife habitat (New Mexican spotted owl) and preventing forest fires while still removing undergrowth.
Your presentation of the memorial implies you feel the ranchers and loggers should not be inhibited in any way by the Endangered Species Act.
What is your stance on public land use, especially in the Gila National Forest?
5. Doesn’t your family own a ranch? Do you have grazing rights on public land? Have you been restricted from running cattle in certain areas because of habitat and conservancy issues?
6. The Sierra County Commission has asked the federal government to loosen endangered-species- act laws. Do you agree they should be relaxed? Why or why not?
7. You state you “fought for” better food and security measures for children as a school board member. Can you be more specific about what you did?
8. Common Core is gone. New Mexico is 50th in the state–when its grades could be compared via national Common Core tests, that is.
How would you improve New Mexico’s ranking and what do you think about the state going to state testing?
Do you think public funding should go to religious and privately run charter schools?
9. You said students in New Mexico are not getting their fair share of funding. Do you mean state or federal funding? Please explain, because New Mexico is among the top four states that receive the most federal funding. In state ranking, New Mexico is 17th, or above average in how much funding the state puts toward students.
10. How will you handle two elected positions (Truth or Consequences school board member and state senator)?
11. John Arthur Smith wanted to spend money made from gas and oil leases (which comprised 45 percent of the state’s budget last year) on building roads for gas and oil companies to increase oil and gas companies’ access to leased sites, reducing transportation/delivery time and cost instead of putting that money into social services and education funding.
About 40 percent of the gas and oil businesses are shutting down in the state due to COVID-19. Fracking extraction costs make for a very slim profit margin and the subsequent drop in oil and gas prices put those companies under.
Do you think the legislature should try to save these businesses? Would you choose oil and gas funding or social-services and educational funding?
12. Locally there has been a split among the community concerning Sheriff Glenn Hamilton’s speaking against the Governor’s executive order closing the state. He said the Governor was targeting the area, particularly by keeping Elephant Butte Lake State Park closed, because he opposed the recently passed “red flag” gun law. He also mass-deputized a local church and those who attended the Cowboys for Trump rally on May 17.
Do you think Hamilton favored Christians and Cowboys For Trump proponents over other constituents? Do you think he was defying the Governor’s order and encouraging others to defy the order? What do you think about Hamilton’s actions as an elected official?