More proactive management somewhat reduces public subsidies of T or C golf course and pool

by Kathleen Sloan | October 28, 2021
4 min read
The city commission unanimously approved increases to the municipal golf course's user and membership fees, effective immediately, although no information about the expected additional revenues or possible impact on patronage was provided. Source: Google

New information about the operations of facilities owned by the City of Truth or Consequences that affect the community’s quality of life has been disclosed at several recent public meetings. These developments suggest City Manager Bruce Swingle is bringing about more proactive management of these amenities.

The city’s golf course will increase membership fees, although this will not put a significant dent in the course’s six-figure annual public subsidy. The leak at the municipal swimming pool has finally been fixed after three years. The public library advisory board may be allowed to meet quarterly instead of 10 times a year.


In fiscal year 2020-2021, the public subsidized $269,000 in golf course expenses, Manager Swingle reminded the city commission at its regular meeting on Oct. 27. The course collected only $41,000 in revenue.

As part of the budgeting process for this fiscal year, Swingle asked department heads to recommend cuts and In the hope of increasing course revenue by imposing higher user fees, Community Services Director O. J. Hechler and Golf Course Manager Wes Owen studied other cities’ golf fees. They presented a new user and membership fee schedule at the Oct. 27 city commission meeting that incorporated increased charges of about 40 percent in some cases.

Hechler and Owen’s research was not presented to the public or the city commission, but Swingle informed the commissioners that the new fees were still lower than those charged by other cities.

The meeting packet, available online, contained the old and new fee schedule, which was not discussed during the meeting. Nor did Hechler, Owen or Swingle state how much revenue is expected from the increases or discuss the possible impact on the course’s patronage.

The city commission unanimously approved the increased fees with no discussion.

After the vote, City Commissioner Frances Luna observed: “Imagine if we had to shut down this facility and other services.” Her comment implied that raising user fees or shutting down the golf course are the only options for reducing the course’s public subsidy.


Downtown business owner Ingo Hoeppner, who is running for a seat on the city commission, was asked at a candidates forum held on the Oct. 19 at the Albert J. Lyon Event Center about the status of the municipal pool. Hoeppner, who serves on the T or C recreation advisory board, said the pool was finally fixed.

The Sun called Pool Manager Kyle Blacklock, who confirmed that the pool had been leaking about 10,000 gallons a week for the entire three years he has been manager, adding to the expense of operating this taxpayer-subsidized facility. The leaks were fixed around Oct. 15.

T or C municipal pool
Improper caulking of the metal gutter around the edge of the pool resulted in leaks of 10,000 gallons per week. The problem went unaddressed for three years, until the leaks were finally repaired this month. Source: City of Truth or Consequences

The problem centered on the metal gutter surrounding the upper edge of the pool, whose purpose is to siphon off floating leaves and other debris. The gutter’s caulking “was never done properly,” and the expansion joint in the bottom of the pool also needed re-caulking, Blacklock said. The cost to taxpayers for these repairs was about $40,000.


T or C’s city code stipulates that the five-member citizen advisory board of the public library shall meet 10 times a year. In the 11 months between June 2020 and April 2021 the board met only twice, according to minutes of its meetings. 

T or C library
A proposed new ordinance, if approved by the city commission, will reduce the number of meetings of the public library advisory board from 10 to four a year. A public hearing will be scheduled for November or December to consider the advisability of lessening public oversight of this community information resource. Source: Wikimedia Commons

Board members subsequently approached the city with a request to change their required meeting schedule. At its Oct. 27 meeting, the T or C city commission took the first step toward permitting the library’s oversight board to meet only quarterly. Without discussion, the commission voted unanimously to publish a legal ad that will notify the public of a proposed new ordinance that will institute this change. 

A public hearing on the ordinance will be held at one of the next two city commission meetings. There will only be one commission meeting in November and December.

City Manager Swingle said fewer meeting times are needed since the library is a well-established institution, implying that he sees it as a smooth-running operation that requires little outside oversight.

More public input might be required to make the library of greater community service, but Swingle seems to be carefully choosing his battles for improving city facilities.

Kathleen Sloan is the Sun’s founder and chief reporter. She can be reached at or 575-297-4146.
Share this:

Understanding New Mexico's proposed new social studies standards for K-12 students

“The primary purpose of social studies is to help young people develop the ability to make informed and reasoned decisions for the public good as citizens of a culturally diverse, democratic society in an interdependent world.”
—National Council for the Social Studies 

Reader Michael L. Hayes of Las Cruces commented: What impresses me is that both the proposed standards and some of the criticisms of them are equally grotesque. I make this bold statement on the basis of my experience as a peripatetic high school and college English teacher for 45 years in many states with many students differing in race, religion, gender and socioeconomic background, and as a civic activist (PTA) in public education (My career, however, was as an independent consultant mainly in defense, energy and the environment.)

The proposed social studies standards are conceptually and instructionally flawed. For starters, a “performance standard” is not a standard at all; it is a task. Asking someone to explain something is not unlike asking someone to water the lawn. Nothing measures the performance, but without a measure, there is no standard. The teacher’s subjective judgment will be all that matters, and almost anything will count as satisfying a “performance standard,” even just trying. Students will be left to wonder “what is on the teacher’s mind?” or “have I sucked up enough.”

Four other quick criticisms of the performance standards. One, they are nearly unintelligible because they are written in jargon. PED’s use of jargon in a document intended for the public is worrisome. Bureaucrats often use jargon to confuse or conceal something uninformed, wrong or unworthy. As a result, most parents, some school board members and more than a few teachers do not understand them.

Two, the performance standards are so vague that they fail to define the education which teachers are supposed to teach, students are supposed to learn, and parents are supposed to understand. PED does not define words like “explain” or “describe” so that teachers can apply “standards” consistently and fairly. The standards do not indicate what teachers are supposed to know in order to teach or specify what students are supposed to learn. Supervisors cannot know whether teachers are teaching social studies well or poorly. The standards are so vague that the public, especially parents or guardians, cannot know the content of public education.

Three, many performance standards are simply unrealistic, especially at grade level. Under “Ethnic, Cultural and Identity Performance Standards”; then under “Diversity and Identity”; then under “Kindergarten,” one such standard is: “Identify how their family does things both the same as and different from how other people do things.” Do six-year-olds know how other people do things? Do they know whether these things are relevant to diversity and identity? Or another standard: “Describe their family history, culture, and past to current contributions of people in their main identity groups.” (A proficient writer would have hyphenated the compound adjective to avoid confusing the reader.) Do six-year-olds know so much about these things in relation to their “identity group”? Since teachers obviously do not teach them about these other people and have not taught them about these groups, why are these and similar items in the curriculum; or do teachers assign them to go home and collect this information?

Point four follows from “three”; some information relevant to some performance measures requires a disclosure of personal or family matters. The younger the students, the easier it is for teachers to invade their privacy and not only their privacy, but also the privacy of their parents or guardians, or neighbors, who may never be aware of these disclosures or not become aware of them until afterward. PED has no right to design a curriculum which requires teachers to ask students for information about themselves, parents or guardians, or neighbors, or puts teachers on the spot if the disclosures reveal criminal conduct. (Bill says Jeff’s father plays games in bed with his daughter. Lila says Angelo’s mother gives herself shots in the arm.) Since teacher-student communications have no legal protection to ensure privacy, those disclosures may become public accidentally or deliberately. The effect of these proposal standards is to turn New Mexico schools and teachers into investigative agents of the state and students into little informants or spies.

This PED proposal for social studies standards is a travesty of education despite its appeals to purportedly enlightened principles. It constitutes a clear and present danger to individual liberty and civil liberties. It should be repudiated; its development, investigated; its PED perpetrators, dismissed. No state curriculum should encourage or require the disclosure of private personal information.

I am equally outraged by the comments of some of T or C’s school board members: Christine LaFont and Julianne Stroup, two white Christian women, who belong to one of the larger minorities in America and assume white and Christian privileges. In different terms but for essentially the same reason, both oppose an education which includes lessons about historical events and trends, and social movements and developments, of other minorities. They object to the proposal for the new social studies standards because of its emphasis on individual and group identities not white or Christian. I am not going to reply with specific objections; they are too numerous and too pointed.

Ms. LaFont urges: “It’s better to address what’s similar with all Americans. It’s not good to differentiate.” Ms. Stroup adds: “Our country is not a racist country. We have to teach to respect each other. We have civil rights laws that protect everyone from discrimination. We need to teach civics, love and respect. We need to teach how to be color blind.”

Their desires for unity and homogeneity, and for mutual respect, are a contradiction and an impossibility. Aside from a shared citizenship, which implies acceptance of the Constitution, the rule of law and equality under the law, little else defines Americans. We are additionally defined by our race, religion, national origin, etc. So mutual respect requires individuals to respect others different from themselves. Disrespect desires blacks, Jews or Palestinians to assimilate or to suppress or conceal racial, religious or national origin aspects of their identity. The only people who want erasure of nonwhite, non-Christian, non-American origin aspects of identity are bigots. Ms. LaFont and Ms. Stroud want standards which, by stressing similarities and eliding differences, desire the erasure of such aspects. What they want will result in a social studies curriculum that enables white, Christian, native-born children to grow up to be bigots and all others to be their victims. This would be the academic equivalent of ethnic cleansing.


This postmortem of a case involving a 75-year-old women who went missing from her home in Hillsboro last September sheds light on the bounds of law enforcement’s capacity to respond, especially in large rural jurisdictions such as Sierra County, and underscores the critical role the public, as well as concerned family and friends, can play in assisting a missing person’s search.

Reader Jane Debrott of Hillsboro commented: Thank you for your article on the tragic loss of Betsey. I am a resident of Hillsboro, a friend of Rick and Betsey, and a member of H.E.L.P. The thing that most distresses me now, is the emphasis on Rick’s mis-naming of the color of their car. I fear that this fact will cause Rick to feel that if he had only gotten the facts right, Betsey may have been rescued before it was too late. The incident was a series of unavoidable events, out of everyone’s control, and we will never know what place the correct color of her car may have had in the outcome. It breaks my heart to think that Rick has had one more thing added to his “what ifs” concerning this incident.

Diana Tittle responded: Dear Jane, the Sun undertook this investigation at the request of a Hillsboro resident concerned about the town’s inability to mount a prompt, coordinated response to the disappearance of a neighbor. From the beginning, I shared your concern about how our findings might affect Betsy’s family and friends. After I completed my research and began writing, I weighed each detail I eventually chose to include against my desire to cause no pain and the public’s right to know about the strengths and limitations of law enforcement’s response and the public’s need to know about how to be of meaningful assistance.

There was information I withheld about the state police investigation and the recovery. But I decided to include the issue of the car’s color because the individuals who spotted Betsy’s car emphasized how its color had been key to their identification of it as the vehicle described in Betsy’s Silver Alert. Because the misinformation was corrected within a couple of hours, I also included in this story the following editorial comment meant to put the error in perspective: “The fact that law enforcement throughout the state was on the lookout in the crucial early hours after Betsy’s disappearance for an elderly woman driving a “light blue” instead of a “silver” Accord would, in retrospect, likely not have changed the outcome of the search” [emphasis added].

I would also point to the story’s overarching conclusion about the inadvisability of assigning blame for what happened: “In this case, a perfect storm of unfortunate circumstances, many of them beyond human control, hindered the search that it would fall to Hamilton’s department to lead.”

It is my hope that any pain caused by my reporting will eventually be outweighed by its contribution to a better community understanding of what it will take in the future to mount a successful missing person’s search in rural Sierra County.

Scroll to Top