At the Nov. 13 City Commission meeting, Chris Clark of Landis+Gyr was invited to speak in response to public outcry over the city’s recent smart-meter purchase. The company has a $1-million contract to install a radio-frequency operated smart-meter system for the city-owned electric company. The installation includes placing about 4,000 smart meters on commercial and residential buildings. He was given over 20 minutes and then answered questions from the City Commission.
Under questioning from Mayor Pro-Tem Kathy Clark, he admitted the city had not done a cost analysis to ensure the $1-million being spent from electric-customer bill-paying revenue is a sound purchase.
City Commissioner George Szigeti said YESCO, another smart meter company, presented a performance contract for $9 million, in which smart meters for the water and electric utilities would pay for itself in cost-efficiency savings in 20 years. After the electric-utility smart meters are purchased, water meters would cost another $500,000 or so, Szigeti said, since the “backbone” of the system will have been installed. The city would therefore pay about $1.5 million for the electric and water utilities’ smart meters.
“I feel confident in saying payback would be realized in 10 years,” Szigeti said, not addressing the huge cost disparity between YESCO’s and Landis+Gyr’s pricing, the former a performance contract, the latter an outright cash purchase.
Mayor Pro-Tem Clark noted smart meters must have a life of more than 20 years to realize cost savings, breaking even at 20 years. Landis+Gyr’s Clark said their meters last 20 years, although technology may “outstrip” their utility in five-to-seven years. The city could always upgrade, he said, and the company will service the product for 20 years in any case.
Mayor Pro-Tem Clark asked that customers be allowed to opt-out, which Landis+Gyr’s Clark agreed was a “good idea” and “quite common” among their customers, but no vote was taken on such a measure by her fellow commissioners and City Manager Morris Madrid said nothing.
The fact that many electric companies allow customers to opt-out of smart meters—if they pay high fees– was not part of the discussion. Mayor Pro-Tem Clark, doing a quick search during the meeting, said only 2 percent opt-out, failing to recognize this may be because of high fees.
Landis+Gyr’s Clark also emphasized the lack of danger from electro-magnetic waves, claiming the various equipment transmits only 82 seconds a day and people are safe a half-inch from a smart meter on the outside wall of their home, according to the Federal Communications Commission’s standards.
The public was allowed three minutes at the mic and no interaction with the board. Eight people spoke against smart meters, emphasizing health hazards from electro-magnetic spikes, as well as the danger of meters overheating due to spikes, which cause fires. There are also fire hazards from lithium batteries. Lawsuits from resulting fires and massive uninstallation of faulty-reading smart meters are occurring across the U.S. and Canada, members of the public warned.
Landis+Gyr’s Clark was allowed the last word, saying batteries are not in the meters to be installed for the electric utility at commercial and residential buildings. Water meters may not have a built-in electric power source, however, and may need batteries, which was not addressed. Lawsuits Landis+Gyr has faced or is facing were also not addressed.
Activist Ron Fenn said the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission, which oversees commercially-owned utilities in the state, rejected electric-company PNM’s proposal to install 500,000 smart meters throughout the state, including Albuquerque. “Does the TorC Commission think it is superior or equal to the PRC?” he asked.
City Commissioner George Szigeti had the last word, stating the PRC has only had three out of its slated five members for years and two members can sway a decision.
Fenn said City Manager Morris Madrid and other city staff was in direct negotiation with smart-meter suppliers, yet also judged the seven companies who answered the city’s Request for Proposals. Although there were lower-cost responses, Landis+Gyr was awarded. Morris has faced “eight lawsuits for money owed,” Fenn said, and may have had “special interests in the highly un-transparent process.”
The petition has 250 signatures, Fenn said, which have been verified as registered voters. Only 154 are needed to present the ordinance to the City Commission. It states a 10-year moratorium will occur on smart meters for any city utility. The City Commission then has a choice. It can adopt the ordinance as written. If it opposes or amends the ordinance, then it must go to a special election, allowing the people to decide the matter at the polls.
Citizen Jack Noel, who was successful in getting City Clerk Renee Cantin to approve the petition “as to form,” where Fenn did not succeed, noted that the state pays for special elections since a new law passed.
City Commissioner George Szigeti refuted the information presented by his constituents by stating “anything can be found on the internet.” He recommended going to the World Health Organization website as a sound source, perhaps not realizing it has classified smart meters as a “class 2B carcinogen,” meaning they are possibly cancer causing.
He also refuted the Sierra County Sun’s article for stating the city made the decision to purchase the smart meters with no public input, relying completely on vendor information, with no independent engineering study or cost analysis.
The Sun’s article was based on attending the Aug. 27 meeting at which the City Commission approved the $1-million purchase of smart meters from Landis+Gyr by mere motion, with no public comment allowed. In addition, the Sun’s Inspection of Public Records Act requests for independent studies all came back with “no such documents exist.”
In refutation to lack of study and planning, Szigeti said, “The PUAB has been looking at this since 2014. RF (radio frequency) safety has been considered.”
Concerning public input, Szigeti listed various Public Utility Advisory Board and City Commission meetings going back several years. At those meetings, Scott Griffen, an employee of Johnson Controls and later YESCO—smart-meter companies—presented performance-based contracts. All of the meetings were publicly noticed, he said, and the public could have given input.