T or C “visioning” session produces helpful ideas, complaints, few big proposals

by Kathleen Sloan | July 8, 2021
11 min read
Because the visioning session was not brought before the city commission for approval, the input gathered from the concerned citizens in attendance can be ignored, unlike at sanctioned public hearings, where it becomes part of the public record. Photograph by Kathleen Sloan

Truth or Consequences City Commissioner Randall Aragon organized an unofficial “visioning” session on June 30, allowing residents to speak for five minutes each on how to improve the town’s quality of life. Rebuilding a sense of community, dealing with water scarcity, derelict housing, trash and other quality of life issues were on the minds of the 25 residents who turned out,

Many of the attendees of the evening meeting, which was held in city commission chambers, encouraged Aragon to follow through with his suggestion that, if productive, envisioning sessions should be held quarterly.  

Because the visioning session was not brought before the city commission for approval, the input gathered can be ignored, unlike at sanctioned public hearings, where it becomes part of the public record. Commissioner Aragon avoided creating a quorum by limiting participation to only one other commissioner: Mayor Sandra Whitehead.

Individual commissioners, including the mayor, have no power to set policy or make decisions unless they are sitting as a body with a quorum present in an open meeting that has been officially noticed in a legal advertisement, according to state laws. The only exception to this rule is in the case of an emergency, when notification of a hearing or special meeting in the newspaper of record is not required and only notices posted at city hall and city commission chambers 24 hours in advance are mandated.

Aragon said he and Mayor Pro Tem Amanda Forrister came up with the idea of holding visioning sessions after they took their seats as newly elected commissioners in April 2020. The intent, Aragon said, is to allow residents to “brainstorm” and to increase government “transparency.” Forrister could not attend, Aragon said, but she would probably be present for future visioning sessions.

Aragon chose former City Commissioner Rolf Hechler to be the session’s facilitator. Hechler vacated his seat in April 2020 after choosing not to run for a second term.

Hechler “did a good job” as the facilitator for the city commissioners’ “retreat” last August, Aragon claimed. The retreat was the only planning and visioning session held by the city in 2020. Only city commissioners were allowed to speak. Mayor Whitehead forbade members of the public and the press in attendance from asking commissioners questions, even during breaks and even though only three citizens had made the 40-mile trek out to Kingston, where Whitehead had insisted on holding the retreat.

Aragon’s visioning session may be preparation for a similar retreat this year, though nothing has been scheduled yet.  

Like Hechler, the other “personnel” who were present to help “conduct the meeting”—as stated on Aragon’s Facebook-page announcement of the session—were not elected officials. They were given special leadership status by Aragon in a display of favoritism most elected officials avoid, especially close to election time. Three T or C city commission seats are up this November.

Past City Commissioner George Szigeti was among the “personnel” chosen by Aragon, who acknowledged that he and Szigeti were neighbors. Szigeti was appointed by the city commission to take Steve Green’s seat in 2019, after Green resigned mid-term. Szigeti ran for, but was not elected to, the city commission in 2020. Szigeti was a Public Utility Advisory Board member for seven years before he filled in for Green, taking a nearly two-year hiatus to serve as a city commissioner. He was again appointed by the city commission to serve on the PUAB several months ago and is its chairperson.

City Manager Bruce Swingle and community events organizer Denise Addie were also listed on the Facebook announcement as among the “personnel.” Swingle was present, but Addie did not attend.

Resident Sophia Peron questioned why the visioning session wasn’t being held by the city commission, the city’s elected leaders. Hechler assured her public input would be forwarded to the city commission, but the meeting was not recorded, as is the case with public hearings, and only Szigeti and Swingle appeared to take occasional notes.

Aragon asked Eric Stokes, hired as Sierra Vista Hospital’s chief executive officer about nine months ago, to inform the attendees of his plan for the “old hospital.” (A new $30 million wing was added in 2019.) “The hospital is in great shape” with Stokes at the helm, Aragon said.

Stokes said he is proposing that the hospital’s old wing be transformed into a “behavioral health hospital with 30 beds.” The repurposing would create about 75 new jobs, including two psychiatrists and 30 nurses.

The state needs such facilities for “substance abuse, long-term behavioral health and civil commitments,” among other purposes, Stokes said. The facility would serve patients from around the state, not just from Sierra County. So far, his negotiations with state officials have been encouraging.

Stokes said the proposal will be presented at New Mexico’s 2022 legislative session for approval and funding.

A resident who did not give his name asked why Sierra Vista’s operating room wasn’t being used, since it had been upgraded for hundreds of thousands of dollars several years ago. Stokes said the resumption of general surgeries and the operating room’s use are “part of the three-year plan,” with more information to be provided the public when the plan is completed, probably by September.

Resident Audon Trujillo said the city was supposed to update the 2014 comprehensive plan in 2019 and “any suggestions we make today should be in the updated plan.”

Trujillo presented a long list of suggestions. Global warming should be addressed by the city’s private and public sectors through the planting of trees. Access ramps should be built along the Rio Grande. The trail that once led from the Geronimo Springs to “Tank Hill” should be rebuilt. Tank Hill should have an awning under which people could hang out and play checkers. Campsites should be built on Turtleback Mountain. In-fill adobe housing should be built. The “entertainment board,” among other public boards created by the city commission, should be reconvened. The Lee Belle Johnson building should be returned to the people as a community center and no longer used to house the Spaceport America visitors center. The city’s voting system should be changed from five at-large seats to five “districted” seats that correspond to geographic areas, a reform that, Trujillo said, will amplify the voices of residents within districts and improve representation.

June Jewell, introducing herself as a “resident and artist,” said “local water scarcity” and “global warming” are threatening the quality of life here. Slowing water runoff, promoting its absorption into the ground and harvesting rain water in general should be practiced widely in the community. She named Brad Lancaster of Tucson, Arizona, who has a YouTube channel devoted to water harvesting, and Geoff Watson, water and wastewater manager for Sydney, Australia, as good sources of viable techniques.

Aragon suggested that Jewell confer with Travis Day, natural resource director at Sierra Soil & Water Conservation District.

Resident Rick Dumiak has often come before the city commission to request better monitoring of T or C’s Rotary Park for trash removal and vagrants who violate prohibitions against spending the night in the park. Dumiak has also often asked the city commission to clean up various properties left derelict and trash-strewn for years. He did so again.

As if a floodgate had been opened, several people echoed Dumiak’s statements about derelict, abandoned and trash-filled properties.

The legal process that allows the city to condemn and tear down buildings is complicated, Hechler responded. He also said the city cannot clean up a property without first attaining a lien on it, since the trash removal would violate the state’s anti-donation clause, which prohibits municipalities from donating goods or services to private entities.

“Molly,” who did not give her last name, suggested volunteers join to help clean up properties for those owners who are physically unable to do it themselves. She also suggested the city offer free trash collection days to encourage clean-up efforts.

Resident Pinky Langham said she has lived in T or C for 16 years and has observed each successive city commission’s “promising to clean up the city,” but never doing so.

Mayor Whitehead took exception to the rebuke, insisting the city commission “has tried” to clean up T or C. She noted that city has had free trash days in the past, but residents did not take advantage of them.

Whitehead also minimized the importance of the input provided by those attending the session, claiming “these are the same people who always show up.”

Hechler quickly interceded, thanking all who came out and assuring them “we appreciate your input.”

Resident Ariel Dougherty pointed out the city commission “should listen to its citizens.” Instead, it has allowed several citizen advisory boards to become inactive, which limits residents’ input. Those appointed to still-active citizen advisory boards are often automatically reappointed with no outreach to invite others to apply, are often male and/or past city employees—practices that further muffle residents’ voices.

Dougherty suggested that the parking lot and buildings at the city’s electric yard be converted to a community center. As the yard is across the street from Ralph Edwards Park, the repurposing would make it possible to remove the parking lot recently constructed at Ralph Edwards along the river’s edge, preventing further runoff from polluting the river. Updating the comprehensive plan should be done soon, Dougherty said, this time with the aid of a company prepared to listen to community, “which was a problem with the 2014 comprehensive plan.”

“The city should improve the quality of life for those here,” Dougherty concluded. “Community development will foster tourism.”

Resident Susan Todd asked that the city library serve as the community “information center” for the ideas that emerged from the visioning session, as well as for general information. The library also needs “better computers,” she said, and more staff. The free shuttle bus that used to travel in the summer from downtown to Walmart and Elephant Butte Lake State Park, among other locations, should be reactivated, Todd said. Concrete planters “with red geraniums” should be placed around town.

“Make it [T or C] right for us and tourists will come,” Todd said. “You lose the soul of the town if you go exclusively for tourist dollars.”

Myra and David Vandy, who said they have 20 years’ experience with Silver City’s food cooperative, are encouraging people to support the start-up of the T or C Food Co-op. The interruption of food supply chains during the pandemic is further reason to organize and promote local food sources through such means as a community buying club, they said. The food cooperative will promote “a sense of community; taking care of each other.”

Linda DeMarino, director of MainStreet Truth or Consequences, said the city is “fractured” and polarized. It “needs to be healed” through increased community communication. She said the youth and elderly of the town are divided, as are political parties. The community “needs to come back together.”

Kate Hall agreed with other speakers that the state of some houses and lots and areas of the city are “embarrassing.” She invited attendees to join the “T or C Litter Pickers” volunteer group that communicates about its activities on a Facebook page of the same name. Her neighborhood has monthly potlucks, which have resulted in integration of disparate social groups. She recommended that other neighborhoods hold similar gatherings.

There are known drug houses in her area, Hall said, with slow police response times making calls to the dispatcher meaningless. She asked for better policing. Hall also warned that the recently walled-in wastewater treatment plant near Rotary Park smells bad. The smell is wafting into the Hot Springs Historic District and downtown and is especially noticeable in the morning around 9 a.m.

“Mark,” who purposely did not give his last name, thanked PUAB Chairperson Szigeti for pointing out at a recent meeting of that advisory board the illegality of the city ordinance placing restrictions on the capacity of the solar installations of private citizens and businesses. He asked the city to halt the ordinance’s enforcement. Mark also asked for more information on recently hired Chief of Police Victor Rodriguez. “Why was he not rehired by Belen?” Mark wanted to know. “Why was he investigated [by the City of Belen]?” The Lee Belle Johnson community center should be returned to the people, Mark said, stating all Spaceport America tourism is going through Las Cruces and not T or C.

Concerned about the state of the city’s wells, Mark asked for a detailed report on each of the eight wells in the city’s only wellfield off South Broadway Street. Citing a leak on Veater Street that has going unrepaired for more a month, he said water is being wasted.

City Manager Swingle addressed the water issue. “I was shocked when I came on board—the city has 15 to 20 water leaks a week,” he said. Because the water department’s maintenance staff is limited, the larger leaks are attended to first, delaying the repair of smaller leaks. “Wastewater is no better,” Swingle said.

Aragon prompted Swingle to explain “why this is going on.”

The city’s General Fund has operated on about $4 million a year, Swingle said, which pays for “streets, Sierra County Regional Dispatch Authority, administrative clerks, the library. . . .” To make ends meet, the city has transferred money from its utility funds, resulting in the neglect of infrastructure maintenance and replacement “for decades.”

Given the relative modesty of the proposals put forth by the attendees, near the end of the meeting Hechler asked for “big ideas.” Perhaps too aware of the city’s dire financial straits, no one responded.

author
Kathleen Sloan is the Sun’s founder and chief reporter. She can be reached at kathleen.sloan@gmail.com or 575-297-4146.
Share this:
HAVE YOU SEEN?

Understanding New Mexico's proposed new social studies standards for K-12 students

“The primary purpose of social studies is to help young people develop the ability to make informed and reasoned decisions for the public good as citizens of a culturally diverse, democratic society in an interdependent world.”
—National Council for the Social Studies 

Reader Michael L. Hayes of Las Cruces commented: What impresses me is that both the proposed standards and some of the criticisms of them are equally grotesque. I make this bold statement on the basis of my experience as a peripatetic high school and college English teacher for 45 years in many states with many students differing in race, religion, gender and socioeconomic background, and as a civic activist (PTA) in public education (My career, however, was as an independent consultant mainly in defense, energy and the environment.)

The proposed social studies standards are conceptually and instructionally flawed. For starters, a “performance standard” is not a standard at all; it is a task. Asking someone to explain something is not unlike asking someone to water the lawn. Nothing measures the performance, but without a measure, there is no standard. The teacher’s subjective judgment will be all that matters, and almost anything will count as satisfying a “performance standard,” even just trying. Students will be left to wonder “what is on the teacher’s mind?” or “have I sucked up enough.”

Four other quick criticisms of the performance standards. One, they are nearly unintelligible because they are written in jargon. PED’s use of jargon in a document intended for the public is worrisome. Bureaucrats often use jargon to confuse or conceal something uninformed, wrong or unworthy. As a result, most parents, some school board members and more than a few teachers do not understand them.

Two, the performance standards are so vague that they fail to define the education which teachers are supposed to teach, students are supposed to learn, and parents are supposed to understand. PED does not define words like “explain” or “describe” so that teachers can apply “standards” consistently and fairly. The standards do not indicate what teachers are supposed to know in order to teach or specify what students are supposed to learn. Supervisors cannot know whether teachers are teaching social studies well or poorly. The standards are so vague that the public, especially parents or guardians, cannot know the content of public education.

Three, many performance standards are simply unrealistic, especially at grade level. Under “Ethnic, Cultural and Identity Performance Standards”; then under “Diversity and Identity”; then under “Kindergarten,” one such standard is: “Identify how their family does things both the same as and different from how other people do things.” Do six-year-olds know how other people do things? Do they know whether these things are relevant to diversity and identity? Or another standard: “Describe their family history, culture, and past to current contributions of people in their main identity groups.” (A proficient writer would have hyphenated the compound adjective to avoid confusing the reader.) Do six-year-olds know so much about these things in relation to their “identity group”? Since teachers obviously do not teach them about these other people and have not taught them about these groups, why are these and similar items in the curriculum; or do teachers assign them to go home and collect this information?

Point four follows from “three”; some information relevant to some performance measures requires a disclosure of personal or family matters. The younger the students, the easier it is for teachers to invade their privacy and not only their privacy, but also the privacy of their parents or guardians, or neighbors, who may never be aware of these disclosures or not become aware of them until afterward. PED has no right to design a curriculum which requires teachers to ask students for information about themselves, parents or guardians, or neighbors, or puts teachers on the spot if the disclosures reveal criminal conduct. (Bill says Jeff’s father plays games in bed with his daughter. Lila says Angelo’s mother gives herself shots in the arm.) Since teacher-student communications have no legal protection to ensure privacy, those disclosures may become public accidentally or deliberately. The effect of these proposal standards is to turn New Mexico schools and teachers into investigative agents of the state and students into little informants or spies.

This PED proposal for social studies standards is a travesty of education despite its appeals to purportedly enlightened principles. It constitutes a clear and present danger to individual liberty and civil liberties. It should be repudiated; its development, investigated; its PED perpetrators, dismissed. No state curriculum should encourage or require the disclosure of private personal information.

I am equally outraged by the comments of some of T or C’s school board members: Christine LaFont and Julianne Stroup, two white Christian women, who belong to one of the larger minorities in America and assume white and Christian privileges. In different terms but for essentially the same reason, both oppose an education which includes lessons about historical events and trends, and social movements and developments, of other minorities. They object to the proposal for the new social studies standards because of its emphasis on individual and group identities not white or Christian. I am not going to reply with specific objections; they are too numerous and too pointed.

Ms. LaFont urges: “It’s better to address what’s similar with all Americans. It’s not good to differentiate.” Ms. Stroup adds: “Our country is not a racist country. We have to teach to respect each other. We have civil rights laws that protect everyone from discrimination. We need to teach civics, love and respect. We need to teach how to be color blind.”

Their desires for unity and homogeneity, and for mutual respect, are a contradiction and an impossibility. Aside from a shared citizenship, which implies acceptance of the Constitution, the rule of law and equality under the law, little else defines Americans. We are additionally defined by our race, religion, national origin, etc. So mutual respect requires individuals to respect others different from themselves. Disrespect desires blacks, Jews or Palestinians to assimilate or to suppress or conceal racial, religious or national origin aspects of their identity. The only people who want erasure of nonwhite, non-Christian, non-American origin aspects of identity are bigots. Ms. LaFont and Ms. Stroud want standards which, by stressing similarities and eliding differences, desire the erasure of such aspects. What they want will result in a social studies curriculum that enables white, Christian, native-born children to grow up to be bigots and all others to be their victims. This would be the academic equivalent of ethnic cleansing.

H.E.L.P.

This postmortem of a case involving a 75-year-old women who went missing from her home in Hillsboro last September sheds light on the bounds of law enforcement’s capacity to respond, especially in large rural jurisdictions such as Sierra County, and underscores the critical role the public, as well as concerned family and friends, can play in assisting a missing person’s search.

Reader Jane Debrott of Hillsboro commented: Thank you for your article on the tragic loss of Betsey. I am a resident of Hillsboro, a friend of Rick and Betsey, and a member of H.E.L.P. The thing that most distresses me now, is the emphasis on Rick’s mis-naming of the color of their car. I fear that this fact will cause Rick to feel that if he had only gotten the facts right, Betsey may have been rescued before it was too late. The incident was a series of unavoidable events, out of everyone’s control, and we will never know what place the correct color of her car may have had in the outcome. It breaks my heart to think that Rick has had one more thing added to his “what ifs” concerning this incident.

Diana Tittle responded: Dear Jane, the Sun undertook this investigation at the request of a Hillsboro resident concerned about the town’s inability to mount a prompt, coordinated response to the disappearance of a neighbor. From the beginning, I shared your concern about how our findings might affect Betsy’s family and friends. After I completed my research and began writing, I weighed each detail I eventually chose to include against my desire to cause no pain and the public’s right to know about the strengths and limitations of law enforcement’s response and the public’s need to know about how to be of meaningful assistance.

There was information I withheld about the state police investigation and the recovery. But I decided to include the issue of the car’s color because the individuals who spotted Betsy’s car emphasized how its color had been key to their identification of it as the vehicle described in Betsy’s Silver Alert. Because the misinformation was corrected within a couple of hours, I also included in this story the following editorial comment meant to put the error in perspective: “The fact that law enforcement throughout the state was on the lookout in the crucial early hours after Betsy’s disappearance for an elderly woman driving a “light blue” instead of a “silver” Accord would, in retrospect, likely not have changed the outcome of the search” [emphasis added].

I would also point to the story’s overarching conclusion about the inadvisability of assigning blame for what happened: “In this case, a perfect storm of unfortunate circumstances, many of them beyond human control, hindered the search that it would fall to Hamilton’s department to lead.”

It is my hope that any pain caused by my reporting will eventually be outweighed by its contribution to a better community understanding of what it will take in the future to mount a successful missing person’s search in rural Sierra County.

3 thoughts on “T or C “visioning” session produces helpful ideas, complaints, few big proposals”

  1. I would like meetings like this to be more widely publicized. Not everyone reads Facebook. Thanks.

  2. Not everyone uses Facebook, many of us intentionally do not. The city already has two means of communicating with its citizens: the city website and the monthly utility bill. Perhaps notice of future visioning sessions could be made through those means, as well as other community-beneficial events, such as the work of the T or C Litter Pickers. If the town lacks the personnel to make timely edits to its website or a community information section of the utility bill, perhaps there is a technology class or club at Hot Springs High or volunteers willing to take on such tasks.

  3. Both great comments. I too felt blindsided after the fact. These kinds of meetings are critical to the positive functioning of a very disfunctioning process and the recognition of who this community government is here to serve. Their are many great minds with years of experience with no channel to contribute. By the way, what happened to our old gazebo?

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top