T or C City Commission news roundup

by Kathleen Sloan | May 19, 2021
4 min read
Community Development Director Traci Alvarez stepped to the public microphone in the T or C commission chambers last week to accept a certificate of appreciation for her recent service as acting city manager. Source: City of Truth or Consequences Commission meeting video

The Truth or Consequences City Commission approved the promotion of Community Development Director Traci Alvarez to assistant city manager at its May 12 meeting. The promotion had new City Manager Bruce Swingle’s enthusiastic support.

Swingle, as he promised during the commission’s May 5 budget hearing, presented a resolution that sets the city’s policy for collecting overdue utility bills.

At the end of the meeting, Swingle asked the commission “for direction” about which city officials and staff members should speak to the press, but received no guidance.


After former City Manager Morris Madrid’s resigned in early March, Traci Alvarez served as acting city manager for a little over two months until Swingle came on board, May 3. The May 10 meeting agenda called for Alvarez to receive a certificate of appreciation. She also received a promotion that was not on the agenda.

“Traci has shown time and time again she steps up to the plate,” City Commissioner Frances Luna said. “I say we make her assistant city manager. We are at the bewitching hour. It should be in the budget. Is it the will of the commission?”

“Normally I would need time to consider,” Swingle offered during the pause, “but I would very much support moving her into the assistant city manager position.”

Commissioner Randall Aragon questioned whether it was feasible for one person to serve as both the assistant city manager and community development director. “We can’t overwhelm her.”

City Clerk Angela Torres noted that William Slettom had served in both positions concurrently before his retirement about five years ago.

Swingle promised: “We will work on her workload.” Since Alvarez, he added, “would be doing both jobs anyway . . . she should be paid for it.”

Mayor Sandra Whitehead suggested Swingle, Finance Director Carol Kirkpatrick and Alvarez “come up with a salary.”

“Thank you for your vote of confidence,” Alvarez said.


“There are a lot of informal policies or practices on collecting overdue accounts,” Swingle said, referring to Utility Office Manager Sonya Williams’ revelation at the commission’s May 5 budget session that unnamed superiors had sometimes intervened on behalf of delinquent utility customers to change the collection arrangements she had negotiated.

Favoritism or bullying and other inequitable treatment of utility customers with past-due balances can be prevented by “reducing practices to writing,” Swingle said, introducing a resolution clarifying the city’s collection policies.

Resolution 41 20/21 states city staff may “use all available resources authorized by ordinance or law to collect past-due utility accounts.”

Discretionary payment arrangements have been restricted, however. “The City will require residents having past-due utility account(s) to make full payment on current and subsequent monthly bills and pay off the balance within 12 months,” the resolution states.

In “rare and extreme circumstances,” the utility office manager may petition the city manager to allow a customer to pay off the overdue amount over a longer period of up to two years.

Mayor Pro Tem Amanda Forrister asked if past-due balances were “tied to the person, not the property?”

City Attorney Jay Rubin cited city ordinance 14-36 (H), which allows the city to “file a lien against the property.”

“That doesn’t sound reasonable to me,” Commissioner Aragon said. He expressed the opinion that a landlord should not be held to account for a renter’s utility debt.

Commissioner Luna, taking matters into her own hands, directed the utility office to inform landlords they can be held responsible for tenants’ utility bills. She also unilaterally declared they should be told they can receive copies of tenants’ utility bills, a means of staying apprised of the status of those accounts.

The city commission approved Resolution 41 20/21 unanimously.


During the city manager’s report, Swingle asked the commissioners for “direction” on how to handle the press.

“Do you want me to answer their questions?” Swingle asked. “Do you want the press to have access to department heads? It’s not that they don’t know the answers. They are very knowledgeable.”

Earlier, Swingle had commented: “The public is craving information.” He elaborated: “The public feels it is beating its head against a wall. I need some direction.”

He attributed the public demand for more government transparency in part to the practice of prior city managers, who insisted on “signing contracts that the public often doesn’t know about.”

“That has to change,” Swingle stated.

Only Commissioner Aragon responded to the city manager’s request for guidance about how to handle inquiries from the press—by throwing the ball back to Swingle. “Concerning media access,” Aragon said, “tell us what you want.”

Kathleen Sloan is the Sun’s founder and chief reporter. She can be reached at kathleen.sloan@gmail.com or 575-297-4146.
Share this:

Foundation for Open Government determines T or C's fees to deliver requested electronic documents not allowed under state law

Truth or Consequences has recently begun to charge a fee of 25 cents per page to deliver electronic records requested under the Inspection of Public Records Act. FOG responded to a citizen request to determine the fee’s validity.

Reader Ron Fenn of Truth or Consequences commented: Thank you for informing on this important “right of the people” to know how our government is acting and spending our money.  Mr. Swingle needs to look at cutting costs (personnel) not penalizing residents to reduce the decades old budget deficits.

T or C still mum about problems with city’s water wells, despite only two of eight working properly

A legal ad in the Sierra County Sentinel’s May 21 edition was the first public notice and acknowledgment that two more wells in the city’s eight-well field are in trouble. Four others are offline, raising questions about the city’s water delivery capacity and the water department’s transparency about the health of the well field.

Reader William West of Truth or Consequences commented: If Wells 6 and 7 are leaking “liquid” or water with oil and metal filings, it seems possible, if not likely, we are drinking the same. If a property with a well is sold, the condition of the well water is part of the seller’s disclosure to the buyer. If T or C water is suspect, either because recent consumer confidence reports were not made public or there are capacity or quality problems with the water the city provides, should these concerns be a part of all property disclosures for sales in the city going forward?

It seems to me that fixing basic needs such as clean water, reliable electrical supply, effective stormwater handling and a transparent and aware city council should come before any consideration of “putting lipstick on a pig”-type projects such as the “Riverwalk.”


Wildlife trail or commercial development for Rotary Park?

Please, let us come together to prevent one more desecration. Please let us create, instead, a preserve for wildlife with access for people to the Rio Grande that will stand into the future to preserve the precious, irreplaceable quality of life that we are able to enjoy here.

Reader Patty Kearney of Truth or Consequences commented: Residing in the neighborhood between downtown and Rotary Park, I would not like to see commercial development at Rotary Park. There would be traffic in our residential streets. And the run-off from pavement and/or construction into the river seems environmentally unsound. I have no idea what sort of commercial development is proposed, but I can’t imagine it getting past an environmental impact study—which there ought to be, of course, for anything that goes in that location. I agree with Dr. Spruce. Wetlands restoration and a hiking trail. Investment in projects that make this town more its true self, not something it isn’t, will help us thrive

2 Comments on “T or C City Commission news roundup”

  1. I did a little research. The landlord does not seem to be responsible (nor should she, in my opinion) for tenant’s utility bills if the bill is in the tenant’s name and the rental or lease agreement clearly states the tenant has this responsibility. This doesn’t seem to be something our commissioners are particularly knowledgeable about, despite their zeal for collection of overdue electric bills.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top