T or C Manager Swingle tightens city procedures and money belt

by Kathleen Sloan | May 27, 2021
7 min read
Source: threemountain.academy

With less than a month’s service as the city manager of Truth or Consequences, Bruce Swingle has ushered in good government procedures that reverse years of decision-making by staff behind closed doors instead of by city commissioners in open meetings.

Swingle infused T or C’s budget process with sunshine when, at a public budgeting session that took place on May 5—his third day on the job—he asked department directors to rationalize their proposed expenses to the city commissioners and informed the city commissioners that they were responsible for making the fiscal policy decisions inherent in creating a budget.

Yesterday, during the city commission’s May 26 meeting, Swingle introduced several agenda items that again sought to reverse the usurpation by previous city managers of the commission’s authority and fiscal oversight.

RESOLUTION DEFINING CITY MANAGER AND CITY COMMISSION POWERS

Swingle presented a resolution that laid out what spending and negotiation powers the city manager has “with respect to funds and contracts,” and, in the process, made clear what expenditures and agreements must come before the city commission.

“It is clear no lines have been drawn . . . and staff has been pretty uncertain historically,” Swingle said, referring to the lack of established parameters defining staff’s authority to make procurement and contractual decisions.

Swingle’s resolution states that the city manager is “expressly authorized to execute contracts” of up to $20,000 for personal property [any asset other than real estate], services and construction, provided these expenditures are in the current fiscal year’s budget. The city commission, on the other hand, must approve contracts for items and services valued higher than $20,000 that are in the budget. It is also the city commission’s duty to approve contracts that are not part of the budget, no matter what the value of the contract.

“All procurements,” states the resolution, must follow city “Purchasing Regulations” and the state’s Procurement Code. According to T or C’s Chief Procurement Officer Kim Saavedra, the city’s procurement rules mirror the state’s. In addition, the resolution requires “a certified procurement officer” to sign off on contract and purchases to ensure their “conformance with procurement code.”

The city manager may approve transfer of monies between a department’s various funds, the resolution states. However, any transfer from one department to another must be approved by the city commission.

Legal settlements of up to $25,000 may be authorized by the city manager. Swingle explained that, since city managers are usually at the negotiating table in legal disputes, most attorneys assume the manager can negotiate up to this amount, which is the highest deductible of legal-insurance policies. All other legal settlement authority is retained by the city commission.

The city manager may apply for grants, but resulting awards must first be approved by the city commission before they are accepted.

All memorandums of agreement or understanding, as well as joint powers of agreement, must be reviewed by the city attorney before the city commission exerts its sole authority to enter into these agreements.  

The city commission approved the resolution unanimously.

Mayor Pro Tem Amanda Forrister commended Swingle for adding “checks and balances and transparency” to procurement and contracting processes.

REIMBURSABLE GRANTS ARE STRAINING CITY’S LIQUID CASH POOL

On the agenda as a discussion item was a $1.2 million grant awarded MainStreet Truth or Consequences by the New Mexico Department of Transportation to renovate Foch Street between Main and Broadway streets. Swingle advised the commission that it is a “reimbursement grant.” In other words, he explained, the city has to come up with the cash to do the project and then grant monies will be disbursed based on receipts and proof of work.

“This will be hard for us to pull off with our cash problem,” Swingle said, illustrating that, unlike his predecessors, he intends to guide commission decision-making by providing pertinent financial information.

“The city already has a lot of reimbursable grants,” Swingle added. 

Mayor Pro Tem Amanda Forrister asked if acceptance of the MainStreet grant should be “postponed.”

The grant, Assistant City Manager Traci Alvarez pointed out, had already been accepted by former City Manager Morris Madrid.

City Attorney Jay Rubin confirmed that the grant “was already executed.” In any case, Rubin elaborated, no action could be taken, as the grant was on the agenda for discussion only.

Forrister asked how long it would take for NMDOT to reimburse the city. In her past dealings with the agency, Alvarez replied, “they are pretty quick to respond.”

In the future, Alvarez said she will consider “what we can float,” in terms of up-front cash, noting that projects initiated by the Senior Joint Office on Aging also use city cash that is reimbursed later.

TOO MANY LOANS

Over the past two years the commission has not been given a comprehensive overview by staff of the city’s capital projects priorities. Project grants/loans and bond refinancings have been largely rubber-stamped by the city commission, with no questions asked about their impact on the city’s debt or ability to cover repayment. In Swingle’s first month, he has provided context and guidance to help the city commission set capital priorities.  

At the May 5 budget meeting, the commission agreed that replacement of one of the city’s two 60-year-old electrical transformers is a top priority. The estimated cost has varied from $1.6 million to $1 million.

In the period since the budget meeting, Swingle determined that T or C “has too many loans already.” Nevertheless, he informed the commissioners on May 26, the need to replace the transformer is so urgent, his administration is seeking a loan from the New Mexico Finance Authority. The electric department’s profits are too high to qualify for grants, Electric Department Director Bo Easley had explained during his May 5 budget presentation.

Even though the city commission cut $1.8 million from the fiscal year 2021-2022 budget at the May 5 meeting, the cuts were not sufficient to cover the transformer-replacement cost, as evidenced by Swingle’s NMFA loan negotiation.

Commissioner Frances Luna stated on May 5 that $3 million needed to be cut from the budget, grasping the implications of Swingle’s explanation at the time that the transformer replacement was urgent. 

Swingle said he would keep the city commission informed about the NMFA loan negotiations.

LEGAL SERVICES WILL GO OUT TO BID, ALTHOUGH BELATEDLY

Swingle is familiarizing himself with the expirations of existing city contracts and has run up against a tight deadline.

Swingle acknowledged that the city’s legal services contracts “have to go out to bid,” but also pointed out that there is not enough time to go through the bidding and award process by the time the existing contracts expire.

The city’s contracts with City Attorney Jaime (Jay) Rubin and John Appel, an associate attorney with the Coppler Law Firm of Santa Fe, expire at the end of June, Swingle said.

Both are four-year contracts. State procurement code 3-1-150 states that no contracts for professional services may exceed four years, “including all extensions and renewals.”

Rubin acknowledged that his four-year contract “ended February” and “it was extended from March 1 to June 30.”

Without guidance from Swingle that contract extensions are not allowed, the city commission granted Rubin a second extension on his contract, from July 1 through Sept. 30, and Appel his first extension for the same time period.

“We will use legal services quite a bit in the near future,” Swingle warned the commissioners.

$36 MILLION TO BE SOUGHT FOR WATER/WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE

Although past city managers have opined the city’s water and wastewater infrastructure is in bad shape, Swingle is the first to act on the realization that the 50-year-old systems have hit the critical point where they must be replaced rather than continuously repaired.

Having evidently conferred with Wilson & Company, the city’s on-call engineering firm, Swingle reported that about $36 million should be spent on new water and wastewater infrastructure. By seeking money for concurrent repairs to both systems, Swingle also recognizes the city will save millions in labor, equipment mobilization and street resurfacing. The previous administration tackled infrastructure replacement in separate, piecemeal projects.

Swingle said he’s already in touch with possible granting agencies, but told the commissioners that he was not yet ready to “divulge who they are at this time.”

Swingle is also the first city manager in 15 years or more to insist that the practice of transferring utility fee revenue out of department budgets and into the General Fund to pay for deficit spending must stop. He told city commissioners during the May 5 budget session that the practice is leaving the utilities without money to spend on upkeep and repairs.

author
Kathleen Sloan is the Sun’s founder and chief reporter. She can be reached at kathleen.sloan@gmail.com or 575-297-4146.
Share this:
HAVE YOU SEEN?

Foundation for Open Government determines T or C's fees to deliver requested electronic documents not allowed under state law

Truth or Consequences has recently begun to charge a fee of 25 cents per page to deliver electronic records requested under the Inspection of Public Records Act. FOG responded to a citizen request to determine the fee’s validity.

Reader Ron Fenn of Truth or Consequences commented: Thank you for informing on this important “right of the people” to know how our government is acting and spending our money.  Mr. Swingle needs to look at cutting costs (personnel) not penalizing residents to reduce the decades old budget deficits.

T or C still mum about problems with city’s water wells, despite only two of eight working properly

A legal ad in the Sierra County Sentinel’s May 21 edition was the first public notice and acknowledgment that two more wells in the city’s eight-well field are in trouble. Four others are offline, raising questions about the city’s water delivery capacity and the water department’s transparency about the health of the well field.

Reader William West of Truth or Consequences commented: If Wells 6 and 7 are leaking “liquid” or water with oil and metal filings, it seems possible, if not likely, we are drinking the same. If a property with a well is sold, the condition of the well water is part of the seller’s disclosure to the buyer. If T or C water is suspect, either because recent consumer confidence reports were not made public or there are capacity or quality problems with the water the city provides, should these concerns be a part of all property disclosures for sales in the city going forward?

It seems to me that fixing basic needs such as clean water, reliable electrical supply, effective stormwater handling and a transparent and aware city council should come before any consideration of “putting lipstick on a pig”-type projects such as the “Riverwalk.”

 

Wildlife trail or commercial development for Rotary Park?

Please, let us come together to prevent one more desecration. Please let us create, instead, a preserve for wildlife with access for people to the Rio Grande that will stand into the future to preserve the precious, irreplaceable quality of life that we are able to enjoy here.

Reader Patty Kearney of Truth or Consequences commented: Residing in the neighborhood between downtown and Rotary Park, I would not like to see commercial development at Rotary Park. There would be traffic in our residential streets. And the run-off from pavement and/or construction into the river seems environmentally unsound. I have no idea what sort of commercial development is proposed, but I can’t imagine it getting past an environmental impact study—which there ought to be, of course, for anything that goes in that location. I agree with Dr. Spruce. Wetlands restoration and a hiking trail. Investment in projects that make this town more its true self, not something it isn’t, will help us thrive


RELATED

RELATED
Third day on the job, Swingle brings transparency and reality to T or C’s budgeting process
by Kathleen Sloan | May 10, 2021

In addition to contending with a $1.6 million deficit in the fiscal year 2021-2022 draft budget, new city manager Bruce Swingle informed the city commissioners...


Swingle brings transparency and reality to T or C’s budgeting process: Part 2
by Kathleen Sloan | May 12, 2021

In addition to contending with a $1.6 million deficit in the fiscal year 2021-2022 draft budget for Truth or Consequences, new city manager Bruce Swingle...


Swingle brings transparency and reality to T or C’s budgeting process: Part 3
by Kathleen Sloan | May 14, 2021

In addition to contending with a $1.6 million deficit in the fiscal year 2021-2022 draft budget, new city manager Bruce Swingle informed the city commissioners...


2 Comments on “T or C Manager Swingle tightens city procedures and money belt”

  1. Wow. We may all have to tighten our belts for a while, and probably open our wallets more than we’re used to, but Mr. Swingle seems to have a good grasp of what’s needed in T or C. I think we’re going to be very happy to have him here! Let’s try not to complain for a while, as he figures it all out and starts the process of getting us back on track as a successful city.

  2. Carol Borsello

    The uncommon practice of common sense … I commend Mr. Swingle! Thanks for looking out for us.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top