local government and
public-interest reporting
factual
independent
community-supported
FREE TO ALL

T or C needs electrical charging stations

by Patty Kearney | April 2, 2021
3 min read
Map of Tesla Supercharger stations, offering a recharge of up to 200 miles in 15 minutes. Source: tesla.com

Editor’s Note: This commentary was submitted in response to yesterday’s lead story, “City of T or C plans to build electric vehicle charging stations, apparently without market study or cost-benefit analysis.”

I feel strongly that T or C needs EV (electric vehicle) charging stations. Ideally, an EV owner should be able to drive from here to Albuquerque with a full charge. I’m disappointed that the city is planning for Level II chargers, though. They need to be Level III or DC Fast Charge. I live in an apartment where charging an EV is not possible, so I have been postponing the purchase of an EV until the city’s charging stations become a reality. I asked the electric department about charging stations many months ago, so I knew these were in the works, and I hoped for Level III.

Level III charging stations cost more up front to install, but they will get more use. If there’s a charging fee, more fees will come in. A slow, overnight charge will fail to meet the needs of tourism and the needs of residents who can’t charge at home. A tourist stopping in town doesn’t necessarily want to charge overnight. A resident who needs to charge her car may not be able to access a charger if visitors or other residents are using them for eight hours or so at a time. A car like the Chevy Bolt, which has a substantial battery capacity, would take from 8.5 to 10.5 hours to reach a full charge on a Level II. Fast charging allows more people to use a charging station in a day, allows visitors to charge while they dine or shop, and allows residents to do the same.

As I planned how I might travel as an EV owner, I instantly realized that my entire route will have to be based on charging stations. Level III charging stations, that is. If we don’t have them, the ever-increasing number of EV owners won’t put T or C on their routes. If they see Level II listed on the Energy Department’s Alternative Fuels Data Center, or on Plugshare, or any of the other mapping and routing tools, they still might bypass T or C unless they are at the end of their battery’s range or already planned to stay overnight. Will businesses seeking to draw EV owners start placing ChargePoint or other commercial fast-charging stations on their property? I would pay the modest fee for a charge at such a station. It’s still cheaper than gas. And I don’t like the idea of having to leave my car somewhere for a full day or overnight. I would rather see Level II than none at all, but there are major drawbacks to this choice, and significant advantages to a Level III.

Patty Kearney
Truth or Consequences

Share this:
author
DON’T MISS!

Lujan Grisham’s signature would enact civil rights legislation giving New Mexicans greater ability to sue government employees

by Kathleen Sloan | March 25, 2021
12 min read
It is likely she will sign the bill, which responds to a nationwide wave of citizens’ demands for civil rights reform

Public hearings on grant/loan apps may have implications for utility fees

by Kathleen Sloan | March 5, 2021
6 min read
The public will have a chance to give testimony during two public hearings slated for the March 10 city commission meeting.

Health security for New Mexicans a step closer to reality  

by Véronique De Jaegher | March 18, 2021
With just a couple of days left in the legislative session, it's clear that HB203 is not going anywhere. And it turns out that that’s actually okay.

Why watchdog journalism is disliked and essential

by Diana Tittle | October 16, 2020
Appreciation of the free press's indispensable role as a bulwark of democracy and a check on government has never been universal. Now, with public mistrust of all media at a historic high, the Sun pledges to earn readers' trust.

3 Comments on “T or C needs electrical charging stations”

  1. I agree with Ms. Kearney. And the consideration whether to install such a station should be based more on the potential such a service might provide to attract visitors to T or C rather than any revenue gained from paying users.

  2. I agree wholeheartedly. Electric vehicles ARE the future. Little Carrizozo was talking about the importance of having a charging station in town five years ago. I don’t know if they have followed through, but I’ll bet they have. Tourists with hybrid or electric vehicles WILL look for towns with these charging stations to plan their trips and destinations. I also agree that Level II stations will be a waste of both money and the opportunity. All the downsides mentioned by Ms. Kearney are valid and the town should consider those before making a final decision. Level III stations would be absolutely the best and most used alternative. In terms of pay back they will afford the best “bang for the buck.” Commissioners, please take note.

  3. Patricia Kearney

    The map of Tesla charging stations used as an illustration shows how much Tesla has invested in making sure the drivers of its cars (and only its cars, not Fords or Chevys) never experience “range anxiety.” A non-Tesla map of Level III chargers for all other EV owners would show a huge gap between Deming and Albuquerque. A gap T or C could fill.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top